This quiz will deal with a few different components in the study of sound, with specific reference to wave velocity, acoustic porosity, transmitters, Delta-T, P-wave, voltage, vertical resolution and electrode devices. See how much you know about it!
Shear
Mud
Surface
Compressional
Air-drilled holes
Oil-based mud
Freshwater-based mud
Saltwater-based mud
Shear wave
Compressional wave
Stoneley wave
The time required for sound to travel from the transmitter to a receiver.
The time required for sound to travel through a one foot interval of formation.
The distance traveled by a direct wave from the transmitter through the formation and detected at the receiver.
Potential for deeper depth of investigation beyond the altered zone
Enables accurate data acquisition in large diameter boreholes
Enables faster logging speeds
Increased velocity
Decreased travel times
Increased travel times
Decreased velocity
Remains constant
Decreases
Increases
Mud Waves
Compressional Waves
Stoneley Waves
Leaky Mode
Shear Waves
True
False
True
False
True
False
True
False
Offset
Spacing
Arrival
True
False
True
False
24 inches
17 inches
12 inches
10 inches
Measure formation porosity
Qualitative estimation of permeability
Measure resistivity of the drilling fluid
Determination of flushed zone water saturation
Estimation of diameter of invasion
Ampere’s law
Ohm’s law
Faraday’s law
Mitchell’s law
Emitted from the Ao electrode and returns to the upper and lower A1 electrodes.
Emitted from the Ao electrode and returns to the current return electrode.
Emitted from the current return electrode and returns to the Ao electrode.
Emitted from the upper and lower A1 electrodes and returns to the Ao electrode.
Emitted from the A0 electrode and returns to the upper and lower A1 electrodes.
Emitted from the current return electrode and returns to the A0 electrode.
Emitted from the A0 electrode and returns to the current return electrode.
Emitted from the upper and lower A1 electrodes and returns to the A0 electrode.
The Ao electrode and the current return electrode
Monitor electrodes positioned along the HRID sonde assembly
The Ao electrode and the upper and lower A1 electrodes
Receiver coils within the HRID sonde assembly
< 17 inches
< 10 inches
< 12 inches
< 5 inches
Injecting a voltage into the formation and measuring a current between two electrodes.
Inducing a current into the formation and measuring a voltage between two receiver coils.
Injecting a current into the formation and measuring a voltage drop between two electrodes.
Inducing a voltage into the formation and measuring a current between two receiver coils.
Formation water resistivity (Rw)
True resistivity of the uninvaded formation (Rt)
Mud filtrate resistivity (Rmf)
Flushed zone resistivity (Rxo)
The DSNT is used to help estimate the volume of shale in a formation when combined with density porosity or sonic porosity.
The DSNT is used to determine a value for true resitivity of a formation.
The DSNT is often used as a quantitative estimate of permeability.
True
False
Hydrogen concentration does not influence count rate.
Low concentration of hydrogen results in lower count rates.
High concentration of hydrogen results in lower count rates.
Any physical separation between a detector and formation
The centralization of the detector in the borehole
The distance between the tool and the borehole wall
Glancing
Direct
Static
Decreases the count rate
Increases the count rate
Does not change the count rate
Oxygen
Hydrogen
Helium
10%
50%
35%
40%
Measure formation porosity
Measure formation permeability
Identification of gas bearing formations
Determine formation lithology
Determine formation resitivity
The larger the hole size, the higher the count rate detected
The larger the hole size, the lower the count rate detected
Large hole size has no effect on the count rate detected
Sandstone
Dolomite
Limestone
10 eV– 0.1 eV
1 MeV – 10 eV
10 MeV – 1 MeV
Number of thermal neutron multiplied by 100
Number of epithermal neutrons multiplied by 100
Number of thermal neutrons detected in one second
Number of epithermal neutrons detected in one second
The SS/LS ratio is inversely proportional to formation pososity.
Different formation lithologies do not affect the formation porosity.
Formation lithology must be known to determine accurate formation porosity.
Increased velocity
Increased travel times
Decreased travel times
Decreased velocity
All tools are calibrated at the API test pit in Houston.
A snow block is used to verify neutron tools at the well site..
A horizontal water tank is used to calibrate neutron tools at the well site.
The standard tool is calibrated at the API test pit in Houston.
True
False
Shear
Leaky mode
Compound
Stoneley
Leaky mode
Stoneley
Compressional
Shear
Shear
Mud
Stoneley
Compressional
8
16
4
2
Mud wave
Stoneley wave
Shear wave
Compressional wave
True
False
True
False
True
False
Reflected wave
Totall refracted wave
Critically refracted wave
Offset
Spacing
Delta T
Arrival
Shear Waves
Leaky Mode
Stoneley Waves
Compressional Waves
Mud Waves
True
False
Freshwater-based mud
Oil-based mud
Air-drilled holes
Cased hole
Perpendicular
Parallel
Shear Waves
Stoneley Waves
Compressional Waves
Leaky Mode
Normal Mode
Arrival
Delta T
Spacing
Offset
Long travel times
Low amplitude at a receiver
Velocity is dependent on borehole fluid
Short travel times
Faster
Slower
Formation resistivity is directly proportional to current, and inversely proportional to voltage
A magnetic field intersecting a coil of wire will induce an alternating current in that coil.
Current in a coil of wire creates an electromotive force.
Proportional
Inversely proportional
Low resistivity formations
High resistivity formations
Electrokinetic processes relate to the movement of fluid at the borehole/formation interface, while electrochemical processes related to ionic imbalances between fluids.
Electrokinetic processes relate to ionic imbalances between fluids, while electrochemical processes relate to the movement of fluid at the borehole/formation interface
Measurement of the X-signal in very low resistivity formations.
Subtraction of sonde error from the measurement.
The use of multiple transmitter and/or receiver coils.
Correction for skin effect in very low resistivity formations.
A magnetic field intersecting a coil of wire will induce an alternating voltage in that coil.
Resistivity of a formation is inversely proportional to voltage, and directly proportional to current.
Current in a coil of wire creates an electromotive force.
Mutual signal
R-signal
X-signal
Permeability
Invaded mud filtrate
Shoulder bed resitivity
Borehole resistivity
Formation water resistivity
Sonde error
Skin effect
Mutual coupling
Quadrature
360°
270°
180°
90°
91-inches
60-inches
39-inches
30-inches
24-inches
Type of crystal used
Different tool housings
Half-lives of radioactive material
Different crystal material
Determination of volume of shale
Well-to-well correlation
Determination of diameter of invasion
Assists in determining formation lithology
Depth control
A gamma ray interacts with the scintillation crystal to produce a small pulse of light. This light pulse enters the photo-multiplier tube and strikes a photo-sensitive cathode, emitting electrons. These electrons are multiplied as the avalanche through a series of dynodes, resulting in an electrical pulse that represents one gamma ray detected.
A gamma ray interacts with the scintillation crystal to produce electrons. These electrons enter the photo-multiplier tube and strike a photo-sensitive cathode, emitting a small pulse of light. This pulse of light is amplified as it passes through a series of dynodes, resulting in an electrical pulse that represents one gamma ray detected.
Sodium iodide (NaI)
Bismuth germinate (BGO)
Cesium iodide (CsI)
Sodium chloride (NaCl)
Spontaneously emitted from the nucleus of an atom
Positively charged
No atomic mass
Low energy electromagnetic radiation
No electrical charge
Dual Spaced Neutron Tool (DSNT)
Natural Gamma Ray Tool (NGRT, D4TG, or GTET)
Compensated Spectral Natural Gamma Tool (CSNG)
Spectral Density Logging Tool (SDL)
Sandstone
Limestone
Shale
Dolomite
The total amount of only uranium and thorium in the formation.
The energy level of potassium, uranium, and thorium in the formation.
The total amount of potassium in the formation.
The total amount of potassium, uranium, and thorium in the formation.
100 % of the thorium blanket calibrator's value.
1/200th the sensitivity of the standard tool as measured in the API test pit.
1/2000th the difference in measured count rates between the high and low intervals of the API test pit.
1/200th the difference in measured count rates between the high and low intervals of the API test pit.
The API test pit
Uranium blankets
Halliburton test wells
Thorium blankets
Thorium, potassium, and uranium
Potassium, uranium, and calcium
Americium, uranium, and potassium
Polonium, potassium, and thorium
Uranium, thorium, and americium
The period of time needed for radioactivie material to gain one-half of its radioactivity.
The period of time required for a radioactive material to lose one-half of its radioactivity.
The period of time required before radiation emitted from radioactive material is at a safe level.
A qualitative indicator of formation permeability.
Mud filtrate resistivity (Rmf).
True resistivity of the uninvaded formation (Rt).
Formation porosity (Φ)
Determination of formation water resistivity (Rw)
Determination of volume of shale
Estimation of diameter of invasion
Well-to-well correlation
Determination of bed thickness
Liquid junction potential
Membrane potential
Electrokinetic potential
Rmf < Rw
Rmf > Rw
Rmf = Rw
Electrokinetic potentials
Liquid junction potential
Membrane potential
Electrochemical potentials
Oil-based mud
Water-based mud
Air-drilled holes
Cased hole
A downhole electrode and a current return electrode, both located on the tool.
A downhole electrode and a reference electrode at the surface.
A downhole electrode and casing.
A downhole electrode and the wireline.
Borehole drilled with light mud
Hydrostatic pressure in the borehole balances formation pressure
Borehole drilled with very heavy mud
Hydrostatic pressure is less in the formation than in the borehole
Electrokinetic potential
Liquid juction potential
Membrane potential
Electrochemical potential
Electrokinetic potential
Membrane potential
Liquid junction potential
Rmf is greater than Rw
Rmf is less than Rw
Rmf is equal to Rw
Zone B is saturated with oil
Zone B is saturated with gas
Zone B is saturated with fresh water
Zone B is saturated with salt water
Zone A is most probably a sandstone saturated with oil
Zone A is most probably a sandstone saturated with gas
Zone A is most probably a sandstone saturated with fresh water
Zone A is most probably a sandstone saturated with salt water
Zone A is most probably a shale
Borehole corrections have been applied to the readings
Gas corrections have been applied to the readings
Borehole corrections have NOT been applied to the readings
The borehole fluid has invaded into Zone A
The formation fluids are entering the wellbore in Zone A
Rmf is greater than Rw
Rmf is less than Rw
Rmf is equal to Rw
Rmf is greater than Rw
Rmf is less than Rw
Rmf is equal to Rw
There is an indication of high salt water saturation
There is an indication of permeability
There is an indication of zero porosity
There is an indication of high neutron porosity
Rmf greater than Rw
Rmf less than Rw
Rmf equal to Rw
2 ohm-meters
2002 ohm-meters
2,020 ohm-meters
2,200 ohm-meters
20,000 ohm-meters
Formation Porosity increases
Formation Porosity decreases
Formation Temperature increases
Formation Temperature decreases
Hole size increases
Hole size decreases
Formation Pressure increases
Formation Pressure decreases
There is gas in the formation
Using a Limestone matrix for the neutron porosity calculation
Using a Sandstone matrix for the neutron porosity calculation
Using a Dolomite matrix for the neutron porosity calculation
Formation Porosity increases
Formation Porosity decreases
There is gas in the formation
Using a Limestone matrix for the neutron porosity calculation
Using a Sandstone matrix for the neutron porosity calculation
Using a Dolomite matrix for the neutron porosity calculation